Anish J. Banker

Mr. Banker is an accomplished civil litigator with extensive experience in handling a wide array of general and complex commercial, real estate, and business litigation matters. He has a proven track record of achieving favorable results for his clients. His practice is concentrated primarily on eminent domain, inverse condemnation, and related real estate litigation and valuation disputes, including landlord-tenant disputes. Mr. Banker regularly advises real estate developers, financial institutions, institutional investors, private property owners and business owners in all aspects of eminent domain and inverse condemnation matters, and has successfully resolved some of the largest, complex land acquisition and valuation disputes in Southern California. Mr. Banker has been consistently named a Rising Star in Eminent Domain between 2012 - 2018, and a Super Lawyer in Eminent Domain between 2021 – 2026 in Law & Politics magazine's Southern California Super Lawyers - Rising Stars, a designation given to the top 2.5% of attorneys in California. Super Lawyers is a rating service of outstanding lawyers who have attained a high degree of peer recognition and professional achievement. Awards and Honors Super Lawyers® Selectees Anish J. Banker included in a Super Lawyers® list Honors Selected To Super Lawyers Rising Stars: 2012 - 2017 Super Lawyers from 2021-2026 Other Sources of Feedback About Anish J. Banker Included on the 2026Southern California Super Lawyers list Past Lists 2025 Southern California Super Lawyers list 2024 Southern California Super Lawyers list 2023 Southern California Super Lawyers list 2022 Southern California Super Lawyers list 2021 Southern California Super Lawyers list 2017 Southern California Super Lawyers list 2016 Southern California Super Lawyers list 2015 Southern California Super Lawyers list 2014 Southern California Super Lawyers list 2013 Southern California Super Lawyers list 2012 Southern California Super Lawyers list

• Partner

• Honorable Patricia D. Benke, California Appellate Court Judge, for the Fourth District, Division One, Judicial Extern

• Speaker, “The RON Process and Obtaining Prejudgment Possession”, IRWA Chapter 57 Seminar (October 12, 2018)
• Speaker, “Property Acquisition for Public Use: A Focused Look at a Complex Process”, IRWA, 3rd Annual Spring Seminar (April 11, 2019)
• Speaker, “Resolution of Necessity Hearings – Applicable Law, Practices, Procedures, Pitfalls and Precautions: Condemnor and Condemnee Perspectives”, 22nd Annual Eminent Domain Conference (San Diego): The Basics & Beyond (March 5-6, 2020)
• Speaker, “Most Injurious Use: Ways to Use It, Abuse It, and What the Courts are Saying About It”, 53rd Annual Litigation Seminar, Appraisal Institute, Southern California Chapter (November 5, 2020)
• Speaker, “The Before, During, and After of Recovering for Loss of Business Goodwill in California”, 24th Annual Eminent Domain Conference (San Diego): The Basics & Beyond (March 3-4, 2022)
• Speaker, “Most Injurious Use – Ways to Use It, Abuse It, and What the Courts Are Saying About It”, 2022 Spring Litigation Conference, Appraisal Institute, Northern California Chapter (June 2, 2022)
• Speaker, “Mom and Pop Operations: How to Effectively Represent Small Businesses Seeking Compensation in Eminent Domain Proceedings”, 25th Annual Eminent Domain Conference (Anaheim) (March 16-17, 2023)
• Speaker, “What’s So Special About Special-Use Properties? Insight on California Evidence Code section 824”, IRWA Chapter 1’s 31st Annual Valuation Seminar (Montebello) (May 25, 2023)
• Speaker, “Early Collaboration to Resolve Possession, Discovery, and Other Issues: Case Studies and Example”, 26th Annual Eminent Domain Conference (Anaheim) (February 8-9, 2024)
• Speaker, “That's What They Said: Are Others’ Opinions a Recognized Method and Technique? Insight on the Application of People v. Sanchez and Case Specific Hearsay to Valuation Trials”, 9th Annual Joint IRWA Chapter 57 and Southern California Chapter of the Appraisal Institute (SCCAI) Conference (Riverside) (April 3, 2024)
• Speaker, “Temporary Construction Easements: Use, Abuse, and Pitfalls”, 27th Annual Eminent Domain Conference (Irvine) (January 23-24, 2025)
• Co-Author: “Ownership and Use and Contiguity, Oh My! – Analyzing larger parcel impacts on residential community common area,” Right of Way Magazine - The Voice of the Right of Way Profession, March / April 2025
• Speaker, “Mitigation of Damages: A Business Owner’s Duty to Mitigate Its Damages, and an Agency’s Obligation”, 28th Annual Eminent Domain Conference (Irvine) (March 9-10, 2026)
• Author, “A Defender of Property Rights: Property Owner-Focused, Eminent Domain Representation”, Riverside Lawyer, March 2026, Vol. 76, Number 3

• Pomona Unified School District v. GTD, LLC — (Initial Offer: $5.5 million; Result: $14.5 million)
• City of La Mirada v. Majestic Realty — (Initial Offer: $93,000; Result: $2.3 million)
• Caltrans v. 7301 Artesia Blvd., LLC — (Initial Offer: $301,000; Result: $1.25 million PLUS)
• Palm Springs Unified School District v. Palm Investment Group — (Initial Offer: $4,446,000; Result: $7.8 million PLUS)
• OCTA v. Cobblestone 1993, Ltd., et al — (Initial Offer: $2,661,000; Result: $4.7 million)
• Caltrans v. Capistrano Enterprises, et al — (Initial Offer: $1,049,000; Result: $2 million)
• Caltrans v. Kardos — (Initial Offer: $176,000; Result: $675,000)
• Caltrans v. Mike Thompson’s RV — (Initial Offer: $192,000; Result: $1.6 Million)
• Olivier v. County of San Bernardino, Orange County Transportation Authority and Caltrans — (Initial Offer: $0; Result: $305,000)
• Sand Canyon Service Station, Inc. v. City of Irvine, Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) — (Initial Offer: $0; Result: $300,000)
• Los Angeles County Metropolitan Authority (MTA) v. Blissful Images, Inc. — (Initial Offer: $38,080; Result: $350,000)
• Long Beach Redevelopment Agency v. Hit & Miss — (Initial Offer: $97,390; Result: $601,500 PLUS)
• City of Bakersfield v. Choi — (Initial Offer: $203,670; Result: $333,000)
• Caltrans v. Hankins — (Initial Offer: $0; Result: $215,000)
• OCTA v. Lee, et al — (Initial Offer: $59,355; Result: $740,000 PLUS)
• Healthy Solutions v. City of Newport Beach, Caltrans — (Initial Offer: $0; Result: $455,000)
• Caltrans v. Newport Diversified, Inc. (Combined Initial Offer: $606,308.00; Result: $6.75 million PLUS)

• California
• U.S. District Court Central District of California

• State Bar of California
• Orange County Bar Association
• American Bar Association